Research view
Title: | Emotional empathy and cognitive styles in psychodynamic group therapy: UAE experience |
Author: | Hala Fakhry , Sherif M. Gohar , Mohamed A. Khalil , Maged A. Gomaa , Monem Reham Abdel , Afra Salem |
Abstract: |
Background
Practice of group therapy has been unexpectedly accepted against the
presumption that patients could reject the idea of self-disclosure in the presence
of strangers.
Objectives
The present study was designed to study group psychotherapy experience in the
United Arab Emirates (UAE). The group cohesion process along the time of therapy
was studied. A trial was also carried out to explore the impact of attending such
groups on aspects of thinking described as cognitive styles as fears of failure and
anger expression, as well as cognitive orientation of emotions and empathy.
Patients and methods
In the present case–control study, 80 patients (40 males and 40 females) between
19 and 45 years of age with different DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses were recruited
and subdivided into four groups. Each group included 20 patients − 20 males and 20
females allocated to attend group therapy [male group (MGp) and female group
(FGp)], whereas the other 20 males and 20 females were allocated into
comparative groups not attending group therapy [male comparative (MCm) and
female comparative (FCm)]. All groups were further compared with frequencymatched
healthy volunteers who served as control groups consisting of 20 males in
the MCl group and 20 females in the FCl group. Sharing groups were subjected to
clinical psychiatric examination and baseline psychometric assessment using Fear
Of Failure (FOF1), Trait Meta Mood Scale (TMMS1), Arabic Anger Scale (AAS1),
and Emotional Empathy Scale (EES1). Each patient in the male group (MGp) and
the female group (FGp) attended at least 40 sessions in closed groups for 1 year.
Group cohesion was assessed monthly using The Group Cohesiveness Scale
(GCS) (1–12) for both groups. Psychometric re-evaluation at the end of 1 year was
performed for all groups using the same tests − FOF2, TMMS2, AAS2, and EES2.
All available scores were subjected to statistical analysis.
Results
Baseline readings showed statistically significant higher scores of FOF1 and AAS1
in patients compared with controls (P<0.00001) and lower scores of TMMS1 and
EES1 (P=0.0020 for the three male groups and P<0.00001 for the three female
groups). However, differences between groups of patients [(MGp vs. MCm) and
(FGp vs. FCm)] were nonsignificant for FOF1 (P=1 and 0.28809), AAS1 (P=1 and
0.5186), TMMS1 (P=0.6326 and 0.6773), and EES1 (P=0.7491 and 1). In general,
females showed more regular attendance during group sessions compared with
males, but the difference was nonsignificant statistically. Patients’ assessment of
group cohesion generally increased along the 12 months as denoted by GCS
scores. Patients attending group therapy demonstrated variable levels of
improvements compared with other groups of patients not attending group
therapy and compared with controls. FOF2 demonstrated definite improvement
in the MGp compared with the MCm group (P=0.0283) and in the FGp compared
with the FCm group (P=0.0480); however, improvement was beyond normality
compared with control groups (P<0.00001). EES2 demonstrated definite
improvement in the MGp compared with the MCm group (P=0.01813) and in
the FGp compared with the FCm group (P=0.038434), and improvement reached
normality compared with control groups (P is nonsignificant). All TMMS2 scores of
patient groups increased on treatment regardless of attending group therapy or not.
Improvement in males reached normal levels compared with controls (P=0.1220 for
the three male groups), but not in female patients (P=0.0021 for FGp vs. FCl).
However, FGp patients showed more improvement than the FCm group
(P=0.0044). AAS2 demonstrated definite improvement in scores in all groups of
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which
allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work
noncommercially, as long as the author is credited and the new
creations are licensed under the identical terms.
132 Original article
© 2016 Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow DOI: 10.4103/1110-1105.195544
[Downloaded free from http://www.new.ejpsy.eg.net on Saturday, February 25, 2017, IP: 41.69.133.165]
patients after treatment with no significant difference between the MGp and MCm
group (P=0.6756) or between the FGp and FCm group (P=0.1903); however,
improvement was beyond normality in comparison with control groups
(P<0.00001).
Conclusion
Group therapy has been successfully accepted among UAE psychiatric patients,
improving their fears about failure and empathy and to variable degree cognitive
orientation of emotions but not anger expression.
Keywords:
cognitive styles, empathy, group cohesion, group therapy
|
Journal: | Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry 2016, 37:132–147 |
Text: | |
Download Link |