Research view
| Title: | Characteristics of autism spectrum disorders in a sample of egyptian and saudi patients: transcultural cross sectional study. |
| Author: | Hussein H, Taha GR, Almanasef A. |
| Abstract: |
BACKGROUND: Autism is a biological disorder with clearly defined
phenomenology. Studies from the Middle East on this topic have been particularly
rare. Little is known about the influence of culture on clinical features,
presentations and management of autism. The current study was done to compare
characteristics of autism in two groups of Egyptian as well as Saudi children.
METHODS: The sample included 48 children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. They were
recruited from the Okasha Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
Egypt and Al-Amal Complex for Mental Health, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
They were grouped into an Egyptian group (n = 20) and a Saudi group (n = 28).
They were assessed both clinically and psychometrically using the GARS, the
Vineland adaptive behavioral scale, and the Stanford Binnet IQ test.
RESULTS: Typical autism was more prevalent than atypical autism in both groups.
There were no statistically significant differences in clinical variables like
regression, hyperactivity, epilepsy or mental retardation. Delayed language
development was significantly higher in the Egyptian group while delay in all
developmental milestones was more significant in the Saudi group. The Vineland
communication subscale showed more significant severe and profound communication
defects in the Saudi group while the Gilliam developmental subscale showed
significantly more average scores in the Egyptian group. Both groups differed
significantly such that the age of noticing abnormality was younger in the Saudi
group. The age at diagnosis and at the commencement of intervention was lower in
the Egyptian group. The Saudi group showed a higher percentage of missing
examinations, older birth order and significantly higher preference to drug
treatment, while the Egyptian group showed a high preference to behavioral and
phoniatric therapies, higher paternal and maternal education, higher employment
among parents and higher family concern.
CONCLUSION: Cultural context may significantly influence the age of noticing
abnormality, the age of starting intervention, developmental and perinatal
problems, family concerns about managing the problem as well as familial tendency
for neurodevelopmental disorders, all of which have important impact on clinical
symptomatology and severity of autism. Culture also influences significantly the
ways of investigating and treating autism.
|
| Journal: | Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2011 Nov 3;5:34. |