Research view
| Title: | Cognitive functions after hemorrhagic stroke: follow-up study |
| Author: | Hala Ahmed El-Boraiea, Mohamed Abd El-Salam Mohamedb, Mostafa Amra and Salwa Tobara |
| Abstract: |
Stroke remains a major healthcare problem. Approximately
795 000 people in the United States have stroke each
year. About 610 000 are first events, and 6.4 million
Americans are stroke survivors [1]. Stroke is also a leading
cause of functional impairments, with 20% of survivors
requiring institutional care after 3 months and 15–30%
being permanently disabled. Effective prevention remains
the best approach for reducing the burden of
stroke. Primary prevention is particularly important
because greater than 77% of strokes are first events [2].
Cognitive decline after stroke is more common than
stroke recurrence. Stroke doubles the risk of dementia
and is a major contributor to vascular cognitive impairment
(VCI) and vascular dementia [3].
There are few prospective data on the long-term
cognitive changes and predictors of incident dementia
after a first stroke [4]. Stroke is not only a preventable
but also a treatable disease. However, as the treatment is
only safe and licensed within the first 3 h after stroke,
advancements neurologic services are needed, with an
emphasis on immediate care [5].
Fewer studies have focused on the behavioral and
cognitive manifestations after stroke and these disorders
are often overlooked in clinical practice. Frequently
occurring symptoms are personality changes [6] and neuropsychiatric disorders, such as poststroke depression,
anxiety disorders, or apathy [7]. In addition, neuropsychological
disorders, such as amnesia, executive dysfunction, or
unilateral neglect, are common clinical manifestations after
stroke and may be the single or dominant presenting
features [8].
Most studies on the relation between stroke and cognitive
impairment have reported on vascular dementia or
poststroke dementia in general. The concept of vascular
dementia has recently been discarded by most researchers
because of the inconsistent criteria used to define vascular
dementia [9] and because the level of cognitive impairment
required for a diagnosis of dementia does not allow
early identification of patients with less severe but
seriously invalidating cognitive disturbances [10]. Subsequently,
a range of conceptsthat include milder forms of
cognitive impairment have been developed over the past
few years, such as VCI [11], ‘mild cognitive impairment’
[12], or ‘cognitive impairment, no dementia’
(CIND) [13]. Although these concepts are preferable to
that of vascular dementia, they will attempt to capture a
very diverse phenomenon under one header, resulting in
poor prognostic value and confusion in the literature.
Moreover, these concepts do not provide information on
the nature of the underlying cognitive disorder and the
specific disability that might arise from these deficits.
Nevertheless, early diagnosis of specific cognitive deficits
such as amnesia or executive dysfunction could be very
important to determine an appropriate discharge destination
and in particular to facilitate rehabilitation. Also,
interventions aimed at restoring specific cognitive functions
can be initiated at an earlier stage, as studies have
shown that the brain displays a heightened sensitivity to
rehabilitation early after the stroke as compared with later
stages [14,15].
Although the brain is capable of reorganization and
significant cognitive recovery may occur in the first
months after stroke, many patients do not show
improvement at all or even show deterioration in the
long term [16], resulting in poststroke dementia [17].
Clinical criteria for VCI as well as vascular CIND are still
lacking, and major discussions are ongoing in this field.
Detection of cognitive impairment has two difficulties: a
neuropsychological battery fitted to the VCI profile is yet
to be established and limits from normal cognition are
still undefined [18]. Although clinical criteria are still
undefined, considerable work has been carried out to
determine the frequency, characteristics, and evolution of
VCI and V-CIND. Importantly, there is a growing interest
in V-CIND, because patients with only mild cognitive
deficits also have significant disability, may be at an
increased risk of cognitive deterioration, and have more
opportunities for treatment and prevention [19]. There
are few prospective data from population-based studies
on the long-term cognitive changes and predictors of
incident dementia after a first stroke. It is also uncertain
whether early poststroke cognitive status is associated
with a high risk of future incident dementia. The aim of
this study was to determine the frequency of CIND after
intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke and to study their
evolution toward dementia (transitions in cognitive state)
during a 2-year follow-up.
|
| Journal: | Middle East Current Psychiatry 2011, 18:203–210 |
| Text: | |
| download | |