
Research view
Title: | Neurological soft signs and cognitive impairment in obsessive–compulsive disorder patients and their first-degree relatives |
Author: | Mohammed A.E. Kader, Mostafa K. Esmaeel, Nahla E.S. Nagy and Hesham A. Hatata |
Abstract: |
Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized
by the presence of either obsessions or compulsions that
cause significant distress in afflicted individuals. OCD
is a relatively frequent psychiatric disorder with the
12-month prevalence in adults ranging from 0.6 to 1.0%,
according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV), and an estimated lifetime of
1.6%. Estimates of prevalence vary slightly across
countries depending on different research methodologies
[1]. Neurological soft signs (NSSs) are minor
neurological abnormalities that are thought to be
secondary to a neurodevelopmental abnormality; they
cannot be localized by brain screening tests. These signs
may reflect brain dysfunctions in psychiatric disorders.
NSSs can be generally grouped as sensory integration,
motor coordination, sequencing of complex motor acts,
and others [2].
Although contradictory results have been reported by
studies evaluating NSSs in OCD patients, graphesthesia
disorder, among the sensory integration subgroup of
NSSs, is consistently found to be more common in
OCD patients in studies comparing NSS subscale scores
separately. In the literature, we can find only one study
that compares OCD and schizophrenia patients in terms
of NSSs, which is the study by Tumkaya and colleagues.
In their study, schizophrenia patients performed worse
than OCD patients in all NSS subgroups except sensory
integration [2].
In the context of OCD, deficits in nonverbal memory and
certain executive functions such as set shifting abilityresponse inhibition, and decision making have been
widely reported [3].
Two studies have demonstrated the presence of such
deficits in remitted patients [4]. There have been two
studies in this regard that revealed deficits in planning
and in response inhibition and set shifting [5] in relatives
of index probands. However, these studies choose more
than one type of unaffected first-degree relatives, and
samples combining more than one generation of relatives
may be biased due to the differing neurodevelopmental
stages of participants.
|
Journal: | Middle East Current Psychiatry 2013, 20:35–41 |
Text: | |
download |