
Research view
Title: | A study of psychosocial correlates of suicide in a sample of suicide attempters in Kuwait |
Author: | Farouk Lotaief, Ihab Shafik, Sulaiman Al-Khadhari and Dina Ibrahim |
Abstract: |
Suicide is a complex phenomenon that has attracted the
attention of philosophers, physician, sociologists, artists,
and psychiatrists over the centuries. Suicide has occurred
consistently throughout recorded history; however, many
researchers have found that attitudes toward suicide vary
widely in different ages, cultures, and societies [1].
Surprisingly, people dying from suicide more than all of
the several armed conflicts around the world and, in many
places, about the same or slightly more than those dying
from traffic accidents. In all countries, suicide is now one
of the three leading causes of death among individuals
aged 15–34 years; until recently, suicide was predominant
among the elderly, but now suicide is prevalent among
younger individuals in both absolute and relative
terms [2].
The WHO has estimated that by the year 2020, B1.53
million individuals will die by suicide, according to
current trends. Worldwide, suicide attempts will be
about 10–20 times more than deaths by suicide. There
will be an average of one suicide every 20 s and a suicide
attempt every 1–2 s [2].
Several studies have reported that suicide attempts range
in intent and medical severity from mild to very severe.
All suicide attempts, irrespective of the extent of injury,
are indications of severe emotional distress, unhappiness,
and/or mental illness. Goes back to the propositions of
the early psychoanalytical psychiatrist who regarded the
amount of violence which is implicit in person with a
suicidal attempts as a form of failed homicide, the turning
of aggression against the self that was formerly directed
against another person [3].
Suicide attempts result in major economic losses. Direct
costs reflect treatment and hospitalization following
suicide attempts and indirect costs represent lost
potential lifetime income because of suicide-related
disability. Notably, every youth suicide implies a loss of
productivity of 50 years or more. The resulting economic
burden from suicides and serious attempts was estimated
to exceed $16 billion annually in the USA [4].
The definitions of attempted suicide used by many
authors differ from those used by psychiatrists. The most
likely explanation is that the individuals who responded
to anonymous inquiries were using a broader definition of
attempted suicide than that by professionals [5].
Schmidtke et al. [6] have provided a definition for suicide
attempt as a potentially self-injurious behavior with a
nonfatal outcome, for which there is evidence (eitherexplicit or implicit) that the person intended to kill
himself or herself.
De Leo et al. [7] have stated that endorsement of the
evidence-based perspective in public health has led to a
shift from an interpretive investigation to an outcomebased
practice that has led to a shift in the use of
terminology. Consequently, ‘fatal suicidal behavior’ is
proposed for those suicidal acts that result in death,
whereas ‘nonfatal suicidal behavior’ refers to suicidal
behavior that does not result in the person’s death. The
intention to die is not always a necessary criterion, but
the attempters should be aware that the action he/she
initiates might cause death. Interestingly, this new
approach seems to be closer to the old definition of
Durkheim: ‘all those death cases directly or indirectly
resulting from a positive or negative act of the victim,
who is aware of the consequences of its behavior’ [8].
More recently and precisely, the WHO defined a suicide
attempt as a self-damaging act carried out with some
intent to die and distinguished from other self-destructive
types of behavior, such as self-mutilation, noncompliance
with medical treatment in severely ill individuals,
and the use of substances such as alcohol and tobacco [2].
An essential preliminary step in the clinical management
of persons who attempt suicide is to consider relevant risk
or causal factors. Many researches and investigations are
still being carried out worldwide in an attempt to
understand and evaluate the risk factors for suicide and
attempted suicide, as it will help to predict the protective
factors against this phenomenon.
Many risk factors are correlated to suicide attempters
ranging from cultural and sociodemographic factors,
family factors, cognitive style and personality factors,
psychiatric disorders, and situational risk factors. Low
socioeconomic status, poor education, and unemployment
in the family are also risk factors [9].
Individual growth is inter-related to collective culture
tradition. Those who lack culture roots have marked
identity problems and lack a model for conflict resolution.
In some stressful situations, they may resort to selfdestructive
behavior such as a suicide attempt or
suicide [9].
In Arab countries, there are little available data on
suicide. In Egypt, Okasha et al. [10] have reported that
the crude rate of suicide attempts in Cairo is 38.5/100 000
per annum. Also, they concluded that individuals who
attempted suicide often face interpersonal problems, and
that their acts may be interpreted more as an attempt to
remedy an intolerable situation than a desire to die.
However, in Kuwait, only a few papers have focused on
this problem; two of these have examined the psychosocial
profile of deliberate self-harm by Al-Sahlawi
et al. [11]. They have reported that women attempt
deliberate self-harm more than men and the most
common method is through an overdose of paracetamol.
Common risk factors found were exposure to stressors
and also depression. However, these studies were retrospective
and were only carried out in one general hospital
in Kuwait (Mobarak Hospital) [11].
Hence, this study was carried out to determine different
risk factors and psychosocial correlates for suicide
attempts in Kuwait.
Suicide attempters with cluster B personality disorders who
have a history of self-mutilation tend to be more depressed,
anxious, and impulsive, and they also tend to underestimate
the lethality of their suicide attempts. Therefore,
clinicians may be unintentionally misled in assessing the
suicide risk of self-mutilators as less serious than it is [12].
|
Journal: | Middle East Current Psychiatry 2012, 19:190–195 |
Text: | |
download |