
Research view
Title: | Clinical and psychodemographic profile of victimized versus nonvictimized Egyptian patients with bipolar mood disorder |
Author: | Mohamed Fekry, Rasha Essam Bassim, Marwa abd El Maguid, Sohier Helmy Al Ghoniemy and Nivert Ahmed Zaki |
Abstract: |
Victimization is a serious and prevalent problem in
individuals with serious mentally illnesses [1]. Therefore,
individuals with mental disorders, especially those with
severe mental illness, living in the community are
vulnerable to victimization and are considered as a
high-risk group [2,3]. Studies that have examined this
correlation have reported victimization among psychiatric
patients to be 2.3–140.4 times higher than that in the
general population [4]. Furthermore, Teplin et al. [2] have
estimated that 25% of mentally ill patients are victimized
in comparison with only 3% of the general population.
In addition, it is estimated that the yearly prevalence
of victimization among psychiatric patients varies from
16 to 92% [5,6].
Many causes have been attributed to the increased risk of
victimization of mentally ill patients, such as impaired
reality testing, disorganized thought processes, impulsiv-ity, and poor planning and problem solving, which can
compromise an individual’s ability to perceive risks and
protect himself/herself [7,8]. Victimization is defined
operationally as either covert/relational victimization or
overt/physical victimization, in which an individual is either
threatened with or subjected to corporeal damage [3].
Bipolar disorder is a chronic mental illness associated with
significant functional and social impairments as well as poor
overall health outcomes [9]. Individuals with bipolar
disorder show unique symptoms that make them vulnerable
to victimization [10,11]. Moreover, the recurrent
manic episodes can lead to nonadherence to medication
and risky behavior, besides leading to social consequences
and consequent interactions with the legal system [9].
These patients may experience high residential instability,
as they leave their supported housing earlier than patients
with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or depression,
which leads to further exacerbation of nonadherence to
medications and substance use problems, as well as
vulnerability to victimization [12,13].
However, White et al. [14], in their study on the
relationship between bipolar disorder and victimization
in the past 6 months, reported that one-third of the
patients had been subjected to victimization, and women
were almost twice as likely to have been victimized
compared with men.
It is worth mentioning that violent victimization includes
rape and sexual assault, robbery, and physical assault [15].
In addition, a history of past victimization has a significant
impact on two important aspects of clinical outcomes:
increased homelessness and decreased quality of life.
Moreover, it is predictive of future victimization [1].
Marly and Buila [16], in their study on 234 adults
diagnosed with mental disorders who were victims of a
traumatic crime, found that 51% reported the crime to the
police and 70% to someone else, namely, a family member,
relative, or service provider; however, perpetrators were
significantly less likely to report the crime [3].
The aim of this study was to explore the clinical and
psychodemographic profile, including the severity of
symptoms and level of functioning, of patients with
bipolar disorder who were victimized in comparison with
their nonvictimized counterparts.
|
Journal: | Middle East Current Psychiatry 2012, 19:131–141 |
Text: | |
download |